David N.
Rahni reporting form New York
The American Chemical Society (ACS) has once again
pioneered, under its "zealot" interpretation of "embargo" by Department of
Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control, by terminating membership of its
long-time members in Iran; many of these members are past
Ph.D. Alumni of American universities.
Several years ago, the ACS undertook a similar unilateral measure,
unprecedented by other sister professional societies, and under the same law,
when it unilaterally stopped accepting scholarly and research manuscripts from
Iranian scientists for the three dozen periodicals in its publication
division.
But later, under
pressure from the American scientific community, particularly its broad
membership, the ACS retreated from such a decision while agreeing to take
it up with the federal government. Paradoxically, this is against the
current administrative policy of prompting people-to-people contact as
enunciated by The Assistant Secretary of State Nicholas Burns at the March 29
hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Yudhijit Bhattacharjee , in
SCIENCE, has reported that the ACS Assistant General Counsel, David
Smorodin when "re-reading the embargo rules, has made the recommendation of
terminating Iranian membership to the ACS management (SCIENCE Magazine, Vol.
315, 30 March 2007). Notwithstanding the individual membership continuation, the
ACS has, however, stated that while Iranian chemists and institutions can
continue to purchase journals and other “non-sensitive” products at
the exorbitantly high full-rate, the ACS will apply for special license
from the Treasury Department to reinstate the membership for Iranian chemists.
Paradoxically, and as in the past, the American Physical Society in
contrast states, "We have NO plan to do anything similar, and continue to serve
our members in Iran." Judy Franz of the APS further
stated that, "We would resist having to obtain a license to the extent we
can."
When interviewed by
internationally acclaimed Science
Magazine, the official publication of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), David Rahni an
Iranian-American chemistry professor in New York stated, "I, like most ACS
members and peers in the scientific community, strongly question the ACS move on
this issue, and expect its leadership to refrain from allowing politics to
taint the stellar stature that the Organization has achieved."
Politically speaking though, the consensus among the nearly one million
Americans of Iranian heritage is to reaffirm their commitment for the
attainment of justice, security, stability, equity, transparency and human
rights in Iran through "home-grown", indigenous and democratic reforms, but not
at the expense of isolating the people, albeit the scientific community
in their motherland from their peers worldwide. They further deplore any
possible unilateral military actions against Iran, as they firmly believe this
is counter-productive in the organic, slow but steady evolution of
Iran through education, cultural reforms and communications with the rest of the
world; they further consider military actions and/or isolations
counter-productive to the credibility of their American homeland abroad
thereby leading to the priceless loss of human and materiel capitals.
Iran's chemist/chemical
engineering community includes tens of thousands. They are by and large
members of the Iranian Chemical Society (WWW.ICS-ir.org).
However, every professional chemist/scientist or professors in
Iran holds at least
one additional overseas membership, mostly in the Royal Societies in the
UK. There are currently 36 Iranian
paid members in the American Chemical Society. The strong stature of
chemistry/chemical engineering in Iran is due to the oil and gas
explorations and petrochemical industry in the past 100 years, and to
some of her renowned contemporary and past
chemists/scientists/philosophers. The contribution of Americans of Iranian
heritage to the chemical and other sciences, engineering and medicine, is
unparalleled by many other recent immigrant communities. There indeed
exist an Iranian Chemists' Association ( http://www.ica-acs.org/news.htm) of the ACS, that has since its inception in the 80's
reached out to over a thousand chemists of Iranian heritage in the U.S.
Alone. It is well substantiated
that supports the thesis that as long as the diplomatic relations between
the two nations remain at a hostile stalemate, that there remains a
political cloud that hovers over the personal and professional aspirations of
Iranian-Americans. Specifically, senior and executive level professional
opportunities for Iranian-Americans, particularly in government, but also
in higher education and the corporate world, remain chronically undermined.
Iran, a multiethnic
country of 70 million, traces its heritage to a long and
illustrious history, 10,000 years in the making, and with 2500 years of a
continuous form of government. There are two million students in her higher
education system, 60% of whom, especially in the science, engineering and
medicine, are women. Its literacy rate is at 90%, unprecedented in that part of
the world. Iran or
[Persia] as it was formerly
known by the outside world till 1935, has indeed contributed immensely
toward the advancement of science and technology in millennia. Rhazes, Avicenna,
Algorithm, Omer Khayam, Hayyan, and many others are just some of the names that
come to a western scholar’s mind.
Despite the tremendous
burden imposed on the very bright Iranian students and scholars when they
struggle to obtain US visa (mostly denied), some of the
best graduate students in Ivy League universities (e.g., Stanford or Harvard) remains
Iranians. The Iranians high school students have continuously ranked among
the top few nations including first rank numerously in the International
Chemistry and other Science Olympiads, and Robotics.
Isn't it ironic
that when ACS claims to be a "congressionally chartered" international
professional society, 130 years old, with a membership of 160,000, 10% of whom,
that is 20,000 are from overseas, and an additional 20%, that is 30,000
members who are naturalized Americans or permanent residents, that it
must force the nationals of one country, Iran, out
and deprive them from maintaining scientific communications with their
peers worldwide and will not let them contribute
toward the advancement in their chosen field?
Notwithstanding the
rhetoric and provocations leading to possible disastrous confrontations by
governments, a true scientist, and an organization of scientists, ACS,
which does not recognize the boundaries of the world,
should easily transcends all political barriers.
Disclaimer: The views expressed
above are personal in scope, and do not necessarily reflect the institution (s)
to which I belong
... Payvand News - 4/5/07 ...